Sub-Clause 2.4 — Employer’s Financial Arrangements

Transparency of project financing: disclosure in the Contract Data and notice of material changes.

Applies in: Red BookYellow BookSilver Book

Under 2017 the Employer’s financial arrangements are described in the Contract Data, and the Employer must give a detailed notice of any material change. The Contractor may request reasonable evidence in specific cases — e.g. a substantial Variation or non-payment. Failure to provide evidence opens the way to suspension (16.1) and termination (16.2). In MDB-financed projects the clause is usually satisfied by the financing itself.

Key points

Financing arrangements sit in the Contract Data (2017).
The Employer must give a detailed notice of material changes.
Evidence can be requested in defined cases.
Breach leads to 16.1 (suspension) and 16.2 (termination).

How this works in practice

Sub-Clause 2.4 is an underused contractor tool. It gives a right to request reasonable evidence that the Employer has the financing to pay, and obliges the Employer to notify material changes to its financial arrangements. On a project where payments have started slipping, this is the first formal step that moves the conversation from promises to documents. If the evidence does not arrive, it opens the route to suspension under Clause 16. Use it early: a request after four months of non-payment reads far worse than one at the first sign.

Common traps

Particular Conditions delete the clause entirely — check this in the tender package, not after the first delay.
The request is framed as a complaint rather than a formal request under 2.4 citing the clause.
The response is not assessed: a letter saying financing is provided for in the budget is not always reasonable evidence.

Versions: 1999 → 2017 → 2022

1999
The Contractor could request reasonable evidence at any time, answerable within 28 days.
2017
Disclosure moved to the Contract Data; the request right is limited to specific triggers.
2022
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.

Clause FAQ

Which FIDIC books use Sub-Clause 2.4?

The clause applies in Red Book, Yellow Book, Silver Book. Particular Conditions may change the standard risk allocation, so always check the project contract.

What counts as reasonable evidence of financing?

A document showing a source of funds for the remaining value of the works: a loan agreement with a development bank, confirmation of a budget appropriation, a parent company guarantee. A general declaration of intent to pay is normally not accepted as evidence. On MDB projects the task is easier: the loan agreement and disbursement schedule are usually available and verifiable.

What if the Employer ignores a 2.4 request?

Failure to provide the evidence is a standalone ground which, combined with Clause 16, can support suspension and — if the position persists — termination. The sequence is strictly procedural: notice, wait out the period, then act. Skipping steps turns a justified suspension into the Contractor’s own breach.

Need a review of a specific contract?

Particular Conditions can change this clause. Send the document — we will check the wording and risks.

Request a review

Reference material, not legal advice. Always check your contract and the Particular Conditions.