Claims
A single 20.2 procedure for both parties instead of separate 20.1 / 2.5. An explicit 28-day time-bar and an 84-day fully detailed claim.
FIDIC · Editions compared
Three generations of the rainbow suite in one place. Below: the big shifts between editions and a clause-by-clause comparison of key Red, Yellow and Silver Book provisions.
A single 20.2 procedure for both parties instead of separate 20.1 / 2.5. An explicit 28-day time-bar and an 84-day fully detailed claim.
From the DAB to a standing DAAB with an emphasis on Dispute Avoidance and a separate Clause 21.
The Engineer must act neutrally when determining (Sub-Clause 3.7), with clear time limits for agreement/determination.
21 clauses instead of 20, more procedural detail, notices and “Advance Warning”.
The 2022 edition is a reprint of 2017 with editorial clarifications, not a new edition.
Only Sub-Clause 20.1 and only for the Contractor; the Employer’s claims went through Sub-Clause 2.5.
A single 20.2 mechanism for both parties, clear 28/84-day periods and an explicit time-bar.
The 2022 reprint kept the 2017 structure with editorial clarifications.
Disputes were in Clause 20 (DAB), often ad hoc, with similar decision periods.
Moved to a separate Clause 21; the DAAB became standing, with dispute avoidance added.
The 2022 reprint clarified DAAB procedure and timing without changing substance.
Determinations were made under Sub-Clause 3.5 without an explicit agreement step.
A two-step 3.7 mechanism (agreement → determination) and a neutrality duty were introduced.
The 2022 reprint clarified the 3.7 timing and procedure.
Sub-Clause 1.3 “Communications” — more general rules without the express “Notice” label.
A formal Notice concept was introduced, with mandatory identification and a clause reference.
The 2022 reprint made editorial clarifications only.
EOT was governed by Sub-Clause 8.4 with a similar list of causes.
Renumbered to 8.5 and tightly linked to the unified 20.2 claims procedure.
The 2022 reprint made no substantive change to EOT.
Governed by Sub-Clause 8.7 (“Delay Damages”).
Renumbered to 8.8 with clarified wording.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
There was no direct equivalent.
A new Sub-Clause 8.4 Advance Warning was introduced.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Clause 10 with a similar taking-over mechanism.
Application/issue timing and “deemed” taking over were clarified.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Sub-Clause 8.3 required a programme, but with less prescribed content.
Content, format (software) and revision rules were substantially detailed.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Clause 9 with equivalent testing mechanics.
Notice timing and the link to the programme were clarified.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Suspension under Sub-Clause 8.8; consequences 8.9, payment for Plant 8.10, prolonged suspension 8.11, resumption 8.12.
A consolidated 8.9–8.12 block: Employer’s Suspension, its consequences, payment for Plant and Materials, and prolonged suspension (84 days).
The 2022 reprint kept the 2017 structure with editorial clarifications.
Clause 14 with a similar payment and certification structure.
Timing, the Statement content and IPC issue were clarified.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
The Contractor could request reasonable evidence at any time, answerable within 28 days.
Disclosure moved to the Contract Data; the request right is limited to specific triggers.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Clause 12 “Measurement and Evaluation” with similar principles.
The measurement procedure, attendance and the 3.7 link were clarified.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Sub-Clause 14.2 with equivalent advance and guarantee mechanics.
Restructured into sub-paragraphs (guarantee, certification, repayment) with clearer wording.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Deduction at Sub-Clause 14.3, payment of retention at Sub-Clause 14.9; a retention bond was not expressly provided.
The same 14.3/14.9 structure plus an explicit retention-bond option and clearer links to the acceptance milestones.
The 2022 reprint made no substantive change to retention.
Clause 13 with a similar structure; value engineering existed.
The 13.3 process (instruction vs request for proposal) and the link to 3.7 were clarified.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Sub-Clause 13.2 allowed Contractor proposals with possible benefit-sharing in some cases.
The same Sub-Clause 13.2 with a clearer procedure for submitting and reviewing the proposal.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Governed by Sub-Clause 4.2 with similar security requirements.
Clear grounds for a call and links to dates/events were added.
The 2022 reprint updated references to the annexed guarantee forms.
Sub-Clause 4.12 with a similar “unforeseeable” test.
The notice process and the link to the unified 20.2 claim mechanism were clarified.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Clause 11 with the DNP and Performance Certificate.
The remedying process and DNP extension were clarified.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Clause 15 with similar termination grounds.
Notice timing and the termination-date valuation were clarified.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Was called Force Majeure (Clause 19).
Renamed Exceptional Events (Clause 18); the list and consequences were clarified.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Clause 5 in Yellow/Silver 1999 with a similar design-duty structure.
The document review procedure and the Engineer’s objection statuses were detailed.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Clause 16 with the same logic; periods and grounds were less detailed.
Grounds, periods and the interplay with 2.4 and 14 were clarified.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Clause 17 also contained the overall liability cap (17.6).
The liability cap moved to 1.15/1.14; Clause 17 focuses on care and indemnities.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Insurance sat in Clause 18.
Moved to Clause 19; policy and timing requirements were detailed.
No substantive change in the 2022 reprint.
Located at Sub-Clause 17.6 (Limitation of Liability) within the risk clause.
Moved to the general provisions — Sub-Clause 1.15, with an explicit list of exclusions and the cap.
The 2022 reprint clarified the exclusion wording without changing substance.
Need to know which edition your contract uses?
Particular Conditions often mix wording from different editions. Send the document — we will identify the base edition and its consequences.
Reference material on the standard forms. Always check your contract and the Particular Conditions.